Lies And Damn Lies About Pinoy Sex Scandal

Across 18 large city faculty districts, the prevalence ranged from 3.5% to 12.6% (median: 5.8%) amongst heterosexual college students; from 6.7% to 20.6% (median: 11.5%) among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students; and from 3.6% to 31.4% (median: 13.5%) amongst not sure students. Nationwide, 5.8% of scholars who had sexual contact with solely the alternative sex, 11.9% of students who had sexual contact with only the same intercourse or with both sexes, and 3.4% of students who had no sexual contact had not gone to highschool due to safety issues. Across 22 states, the prevalence of having texted or e-mailed whereas driving ranged from 33.5% to 65.4% (median: 48.3%) among students who had sexual contact with only the alternative sex, from 30.9% to 61.8% (median: 46.9%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with only the identical sex or with each sexes, and from 11.9% to 34.6% (median: 20.5%) among students who had no sexual contact. Across 19 large urban faculty districts, the prevalence ranged from 11.5% to 27.0% (median 17.6%) among students who had sexual contact with solely the alternative sex, from 7.7% to 31.8% (median: 21.9%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with only the same intercourse or with each sexes, and from 3.2% to 9.2% (median: 5.3%) amongst students who had no sexual contact.

Across 19 states, the prevalence of getting carried a weapon ranged from 12.9% to 32.0% (median: 21.7%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with solely the alternative sex, from 14.2% to 39.2% (median: 26.2%) among students who had sexual contact with solely the identical sex or with both sexes, and from 5.6% to 25.8% (median: 10.8%) among students who had no sexual contact. Nationwide, 9.6% of scholars who had sexual contact with only the opposite intercourse, 15.6% of students who had sexual contact with solely the same sex or with both sexes, and 4.1% of students who had no sexual contact had been in a physical combat on college property. Across 17 giant city faculty districts, the prevalence ranged from 4.4% to 22.9% (median: 8.4%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with only the alternative intercourse, from 4.2% to 28.3% (median: 12.9%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with only the identical intercourse or with each sexes, and from 3.1% to 16.1% (median: 4.9%) among students who had no sexual contact. Across 23 states, the prevalence of not having gone to high school due to security issues ranged from 3.1% to 9.1% (median: 6.6%) among students who had sexual contact with solely the opposite sex, from 8.8% to 25.0% (median: 14.7%) among students who had sexual contact with solely the same intercourse or with both sexes, and from 2.1% to 6.5% (median: 3.6%) among college students who had no sexual contact.

Nationwide, 9.0% of scholars who had sexual contact with only the alternative intercourse, 25.2% of students who had sexual contact with only the identical sex or with both sexes, and 1.4% of scholars who had no sexual contact had ever been bodily forced to have sexual intercourse. Across 18 giant urban faculty districts, the prevalence ranged from 3.7% to 16.0% (median: 8.6%) among college students who had sexual contact with only the alternative intercourse, from 7.6% to 29.8% (median: 14.8%) among college students who had sexual contact with only the identical sex or with each sexes, and from 0.0% to 2.4% (median: 1.4%) amongst students who had no sexual contact. Nationwide, 3.7% of students who had sexual contact with only the other sex, 8.6% of scholars who had sexual contact with only the identical sex or with both sexes, and 1.1% of students who had no sexual contact had been injured in a bodily combat. Across 19 massive urban faculty districts, the prevalence ranged from 6.8% to 15.5% (median: 11.3%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with solely the opposite intercourse, from 11.7% to 33.4% (median: 21.5%) amongst students who had sexual contact with solely the same intercourse or with both sexes, and from 4.5% to 9.9% (median: 8.0%) among college students who had no sexual contact.

Across 17 giant urban school districts, the prevalence ranged from 7.4% to 13.1% (median: 10.2%) among students who had sexual contact with only the other intercourse, from 14.4% to 29.4% (median: 20.6%) amongst students who had sexual contact with solely the same intercourse or with each sexes, and from 1.9% to 6.7% (median: 3.6%) among college students who had no sexual contact. Across 15 large urban college districts, the prevalence ranged from 1.9% to 5.7% (median: 3.9%) among heterosexual students; from 1.9% to 9.9% (median: 4.6%) amongst gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students; and from 0.4% to 21.5% (median: 6.7%) among unsure students. Across 19 massive city college districts, the prevalence ranged from 7.0% to 19.5% (median: 11.4%) among heterosexual college students; from 6.1% to 31.6% (median: 19.5%) among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students; and from 9.4% to 36.2% (median: 17.9%) among unsure college students. Across 19 large urban college districts, the prevalence ranged from 23.8% to 44.0% (median: 31.3%) among college students who had sexual contact with solely the alternative intercourse, from 28.1% to 56.6% (median: 35.8%) amongst college students who had sexual contact with only the identical intercourse or with each sexes, and from 6.9% to 27.1% (median: 11.9%) amongst students who had no sexual contact.